RSS Feed

Tag Archives: Vancouver

Put it in a box and put a ribbon on it — container homes

As soon as I heard about people using a shipping container for the shell of a small house I had to say owchamagowcha — what a great idea.  No surprise that seaport cities have led the way — in Vancouver and Seattle people are finding new uses for these sturdy structures that can be used singly or in combinations–the containers are literally thick on the ground around here.

In Seattle,

The first two cargo homes are being built at the ShelterKraft location in Ballard and set up on Whidbey Island. And, like a boat, they can easily be picked up by a boom crane and transported using a flatbed truck to a different location if needed.

“It’s the ultimate in reuse,” says Amy Gulick, an author and photographer, who purchased a Cargo Cottage with her husband, Chris Gulick. “I love the idea of taking a perfectly good steel structure and making it into something great instead of discarding it into a waste yard.”

Who can argue with recycling, it’s just the size of the tin cans that has changed.

In Vancouver in the heart of Gastown,

The 12 shipping containers on Alexander Street near Jackson Avenue have been converted into apartments by the Atira Women’s Resource Society, which bought a lot on the block in 2009. The first shipping container was dropped on the lot at the end of November, and each unit cost $82,500 to build.

Some of the homes will eventually be occupied by women over the age of 55, who will pay $375 a month in rent, while other units are intended for younger women, who will pay about 30 per cent of market rent.

containers

Wow, said I, I would like to know more about how container living 24-7 — it’s so interesting.  And I found the source to find out more about living in containers, the blog My Home In A Box is a great way to follow the movement.

Small is beautiful!  Pass it on.

Lanescapes

Although we are preparing to landscape our property at our laneway house, and that includes planting attractive plants alongside the lane in “front” of our new home, the lane itself will remain as it is.

Kind of ugly.

There’s pavement down the entire width of the lane, with people’s garages backing onto it.  No one really pays much attention to how the lanes look.

But at one time they did.  According to this story in the Vancouver Observer, at one time long ago (2002), the city wanted to countrify our city lanes.  As illustrated by the blog This City Life and the National Post article they quoted, laneways can look almost…bucolic.

laneWouldn’t that be lovely?  To step out of our front door into a grassy walkway?

Let’s hope this experiment succeeds, and block by block we reclaim our laneways. The city should be paying attention.  As the Vancouver Observer oberved:

How is that not awesome?

What I’m loving about our new neighbourhood

We were incredibly lucky to be able to move into the neighbourhood where the laneway is being built.  Thank goodness for basement suites, as there are very, very few apartment buildings available around here.  The ones that we could find are subsidized housing, and those are nearly impossible to get into, especially for short-term rentals.

watercolor_iCXHbhfkY7w

Our Town

But here we are and we are very happy with the area.  For one thing, transit is a breeze.  We are very close to the Skytrain, and will be even closer when we move to the laneway. We can get downtown, to our gym, to shopping in Burnaby, and to parks and recreation quickly and easily.  The Broadway corridor is right there, with the express buses running during rush hours to whisk me to and from work.  We use the car even less here than we did at our old residence.

Shopping is also great.  I miss my London Drugs right down the street, but there are plenty available a short  Skytrain ride away.  We have a Superstore within easy walking distance, as well as a small shopping centre with a Price Smart, a Pet Smart, Canadian Tire, Mark’s Work Wearhouse, and a Starbucks (*whew*).  There’s a WalMart right down the street, too.

On an exploratory walk around the neighbourhood last weekend, we found several small parks close by.  Plus a possible pizza place.  We also have walked over the Commercial Drive on the Central Valley Greenway, which DH has explored on his bike.

But all this was something we expected, because we thought quite a bit about the neighbourhood before we agreed to move here, checked out the Walk Score, etc. and so we knew what to expect…..or so we thought.

What were we not expecting?  Garbage collection.  I lived in a condo for about 30 years, the years of Garbage Collection Reformation.  In a condo, garbage was something you took out, put in the giant bin, and it magically disappeared. We had visited friends’ homes and seen coloured maps of Vancouver on the sides of their fridges, but we’d never really considered what they were for.  I don’t know if we suspected that all our friends had identical taste in fridge decor, but we just never thought about it.

But now we do!  Because my friend, you LIVE AND DIE by the date of your garbage collection.  Every two weeks that truck trundles down that lane and if you don’t have your garbage out where they can grab it, it’s like Santa, that truck is not going to come back until its appointed time.

Luckily every single week a truck comes by for recycling.  And if you don’t think that’s a motivation to recycle everything you possibly can, you have never tried to fit four week’s garbage into a two-week bin. Now there is something even newer than regular recycling, which is composting.  Vancouver now takes your table scraps and coffee grinds and composts them.  It’s a great idea!  And it makes that every-other-week garbage collection quite doable.

In fact it’s such a good idea that Mayor Bloomberg is doing it in New York City.

Another advantage that I never expected started out as an inconvenience.  I know I’ve mentioned that the laneway is being built into a slope.  I don’t think I’ve told you that the slope is actually a big, honking hill that runs from a couple of streets above ours right down to the Grandview Highway where all the stores are.  Just to get to the Skytrain from the laneway means climbing down, and of course back up, a significant grade.  I thought this would be a pain, but it has turned into a blessing.  The first few times I charged up that hill to catch the 7:38 99 bus, I swear I thought I would pass out.  There were little red dots dancing in front of my eyes.  But just a couple of weeks has given me much more stamina — it’s great exercise!  Who knew!

Oh, the people at Life Edited knew.  They point out in this article that cities where exercise is built right in have healthier citizens.

And I’m good with that.

NIMNBY*

*Not In My Neighbour’s Back Yard

This week’s public meeting at City Hall really opened my eyes to some of the problems the city has in getting anything done. Every time the City wants to move forward there’s always push-back.  Not from everyone, no, but from some of the people who have property here.

Sitting and listening to the speakers at the meeting clued me in to how those people really want things to be. And this is how people want things to be:

The same.

They want their neighbourhood to stay the same — the houses the same size they are now.  They want places to park their cars and roads to drive on them.  They don’t want “developers” and “Translink” to ruin everything. They don’t want laneway houses in their neighbour’s back yards.

castles

There goes the neighbourhood!

But at the same time, they want their property values to go up (but not their civic taxes), they want their kids to be able to buy in the same neighbourhood they live in now, to take safe and convenient public transit to schools that are well-maintained and full of happy kids.

It seems like they want a small-town life in a big city. And they don’t see how that just won’t work.

We live in a big city — with big city problems.  We have homeless.  We have poverty.  We have drugs and crime and traffic.  And we can’t solve those problems if everything remains the same.

Everyone who spoke agreed that we have a housing problem in Vancouver.  We have limited rental space, which makes it very expensive.  We have no more room to build more houses, which means the houses that are here go up in value — a limited supply for an increasing demand. And people want to live here because the jobs and the economy.

Of course some people had solutions.  Don’t densify within Vancouver city limits, let the suburbs absorb the people who will be moving here.  Or densify by building large apartment buildings.  Or densify, but don’t build apartment towers, build low-rise rental buildings, only don’t re-zone any single-family homes to do it. Or (my personal favourite) slow down the economy in Vancouver so people won’t want to move here any more.

There seemed to be a quasi-elitist sentiment behind many of the speakers’ comments — I’ve got mine and now I will protect it by making sure that you don’t get yours. I got the feeling some of them wanted Vancouver to become a gated community, where the professionals and the wealthy get to live here, and the people who flip our burgers and clean our hospitals and type our letters and sell us clothes get to take transit in from the suburbs.

But, as Mark Sakai from the Greater Vancouver Home Builder’s Association pointed out, the city is changing, it has to change and we want it to change.  The only important thing is that it changes in ways that mean a better life for its citizens.

So I am happy that the City has allowed laneways to add to the densification of Vancouver, and I am glad that it’s become more inclusive.  There was some talk about limiting the number of laneway homes allowed to be built on any one block, but everyone could see how unfair — and elitist — that was.

By the way, if anyone is thinking that small town life is stress-and-wierdness-free, remember that Mt. Airy, North Carolina, hometown of Andy Griffith and model for Mayberry, was also where Chang and Eng Bunker, the original Siamese Twins, had their home, and their descendants still live there.

City Hall confidential

This isn’t confidential at all, of course.  I just wanted a really dramatic headline for this post.

I’d never been to Vancouver City Hall before DH and I attended the public hearing on June 11. But I wanted to have my say about laneway homes, I wanted to be sure there was at least one voice who didn’t have a dog in the fight.  It’s one thing to have the developers there — and I was sure they would do a good job.  But I just wanted to be a “Jane Citizen” showing support for laneways knowing that we would not be affected either way.

vancouver-city-hall-1930s

There were two items on the agenda.  First there was a discussion of the Regional Context Statement, our contribution to the Regional Growth Strategy that will be shaping our communities in the next few years.  Since this was my first public hearing, there were two things that really stood out for me

  1. The Vancouver City Council is made up of people who are really on the ball, and
  2. Most people do not listen

Although it was explained that there was no new information in the council’s contribution to the Metro Vancouver report, that is was all about giving the baseline information so people could move forward, speaker after speaker insisted that this was all new information, and their neighbourhood/community/back yard would be adversely affected by the report, and HOW DARE THEY submit this report without their input.

I guess I must expect that average people with a full head of steam about something are going to be sitting rehearsing their five minutes at the podium, and won’t be listening to the replies that all the previous speakers were getting.  But I, a neutral by-stander at the beginning of the process, was 147% in favour of council’s acceptance of the amendment by the end.

Thanks, fellow citizens!  You made council look very good!

Also — what is with the hate-on that people have with Translink?  I’m saving a post about the NIMBYism we encountered throughout the evening for later, but wow.

We got to the part of the evening where we were discussing the amendments affecting laneway homes. The city gave their presentation, which you can see here.  SPOILER ALERT!  These amendments were accepted. (Yay Us!)

I was 8th in the line-up to speak.  First was Jake Fry of Smallworks, who did a very good job presenting the “pro” argument, as did the representative of LaneFab.  A couple of people spoke about their lane homes.  I spoke about how building our laneway is helping keep our family truly together.

There were some arguments against the laneways (see what people opposed wrote to City Hall here).  They were basically:

  1. I don’t like laneways
  2. No one should have them.

Most of the problems people were speaking about were with parking (laneway dwellers using their in-home garages as living or storage rooms so they have to park on the street) and the heights of the 1.5 storey laneways causing loss of sunlight and privacy in their yards.

Since both of these problems are addressed (and hopefully solved) with the new amendments, those arguments didn’t seem to be helpful to the process.

All in all this was a very valuable experience for me.  I actually walked away from the meeting (taking Translink home with DH) feeling much more confident in the transparency of the processes the City uses to decide issues, and in the City Council itself.

And now there will be more laneways!  Huzzah!

A guaranty of quality

I was on the Home Discovery Show this morning for a chat with Ian and Steve.  Their other guest this morning was Mike Holmes.

Yes, that Mike Holmes.

Mike Holmes changes people’s lives by going into their homes after bad building practices or crappy renovating have ruined them, and he makes them right again. He’s a hero to these people.  He respects good work, and he is constantly frustrated when he sees shoddy construction.

But what is to say we’re not going to have a badly constructed laneway home?  Sure, we can see a building going up, but how do we know it’s being built to withstand the weather? To not leak or creak or (shudder) reek?  So we can look forward to years in a well-built home that will need minimal maintenance and will never have to call upon someone like Mike Holmes to fix catastrophic problems.

Well, first of all we trust our builder, Novell.  Angelito and Laurel had our confidence right from the start.  They are a part of the Renomark Renovator Program, a member of the Greater Vancouver HomeBuilders’ Association, and are rated A+ in the Better Business Bureau Business Review. And we’ve seen how they work — always keeping the worksite tidy, using good materials.  Plus we talk with them all the time, in addition to our every-other-week meetings, we can call or email them anytime if we have questions.

And we have another reason to feel confident that our home will be solidly built.

Like all BC residents, we have the Homeowner Protection Office, a branch of BC Housing.  And that means we have Home Warranty Insurance on our new home; we are

covered by mandatory, third-party home warranty insurance. As a minimum, this coverage includes 2 years on labour and materials (some limits apply), 5 years on the building envelope and 10 years on structure. It’s the strongest construction defect insurance in Canada.

The HPO’s Guide to Home Warranty Insurance in British Columbia is a 24-page comprehensive guide to what you can expect in the way of protection.

The 2 year labour and materials coverage includes

defects in materials and labour supplied for the electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation and air conditioning delivery systems, as well as for the exterior cladding, caulking, windows and doors

The 5 year building envelope coverage includes

the components that separate the indoors from the outdoors, including the exterior walls, foundation, roof, windows and doors.

And the 10 year structural coverage includes

defects in materials and labour that result in the failure of a load-bearing part of the new home, and for any defect that causes structural damage that materially and adversely affects the use of the new home for residential occupancy.

Novell has purchased insurance through a company called Pacific Protected for our build.

I recommend that anyone who is building or renovating (or if you are interested in the process) go to the HPO site and explore.  They have guides for every stage of the build so you can see for yourself if each aspect is being built properly.

Another view of the laneway situation from way down south — five reasons to embrace laneways

James Bacon of Bacon’s Rebellion has also written a blog post on the Wall Street Journal story — and he sums up the laneway situation quite eloquently.

Be sure to read the whole story, but briefly, his points are:

First, while accessory units may increase the population density of a neighborhood by today’s standards, they reverse a decades-long trend of de-densification….increasing numbers of accessory units allow urban neighborhoods to return to population densities for which they were originally designed. Why would cities support regulations to halt a healthy evolution?

Second, allowing homeowners to convert idle space (in the case of basement and garage apartments) or add new space (in the case of laneway houses) creates a revenue stream from the property.

Third, accessory units provide an alternative to institutionalizing the elderly in extended living facilities and nursing homes.

Fourth, there is a question of property rights. Conservatives believe in an expanded definition of property rights

Fifth, accessory units are fiscally efficient. They embed new housing in an existing urban fabric of streets, sidewalks, water, sewer and utilities.

I’m pretty sure James and I would not see eye to eye on many political issues, but on the concept of densification in our cities and laneway homes we have found common ground.

From the Wall Street Journal – laneway homes as urban development trend

The Wall Street Journal has been paying attention to the small home trend.  And, clever capitalists as they are, they have put the article behind a paywall.  Scamps.
Video interview with article author, Conor Dougherty.

But writer Conor Dougherty seems to be quite impressed with our laneway homes.

Ajay Kumar built a $300,000, Moroccan-themed cottage that sits in his backyard and will soon be occupied by his parents.

Mr. Kumar’s “laneway house” is part of a broader plan that encourages Vancouver homeowners to add rental units in their basements, attics and backyards. The hope is to reduce sky-high housing costs and increase population density throughout the city—including the single-family-home neighborhoods like Mr. Kumar’s that surround the city’s towering downtown.

…….

During the past two decades, Vancouver’s main approach to add housing has been to go up, constructing scores of downtown condo towers. Recently the city has started rezoning arterial streets to allow more compact row houses.

The city took a step toward increasing density in single-family neighborhoods in the 1980s, when it first allowed basement suites. Since 2009, it has reduced the amount of time it takes to get a permit for basement apartments and permitted laneway homes like Mr. Kumar’s throughout the city.

The article also acknowledges that not everyone is crazy about the idea.

A dozen blocks away, Ronald Hatch also lives next to a laneway home, and he hates it. Mr. Hatch, 73, a retired literature professor, says the two-story home shades his backyard, reducing his raspberry crop.

I can see his point.  I know I would hate it if I had someone build a home that overlooked a formerly open back yard.  But you don’t have to build a laneway to get that effect.  Who has not seen huge, behemoth homes taking up more space vertically and horizontally in these older neighbourhoods?  The zoning is in place.

Getting more people into the city can be done in a number of ways.  You can build more smaller homes or fewer large ones, or some kind of combination of the two.

I’m prejudiced of course, but I prefer the charm of the laneway homes to the giant houses that can take over a neighbourhood.

New Laneway proposals, you know, proposed

Jake Fry and the folks at SmallWorks were kind enough to send along the new regulations and guidelines that Vancouver City Council is considering.

Like us, Jake sees this as part of the evolution of laneway living in the city.

The regulations will be discussed at a Public Hearing on Tuesday, June 11, at 6 pm at Vancouver City Hall.

According to Smallworks, the proposed changes are:

Increasing the permitted floor area to .16 times the lot area, to a
maximum of 900 square feet;

Allowing an additional 40 square feet for storage space (either for
closet space or a separate storage room, e.g. for bike storage);
Increasing the permitted footprint of a one storey home by allowing it
to extend into the rear yard up to 6 feet so that all floor area can
be built at grade;

Continuing to require a 16 foot separation between a LWH and the main
house to maintain backyard open space;

Limiting the height of one storey units to the maximum allowed for a
garage (12 to 15 feet depending on roof form);

Allowing a 2 foot side yard on one side;

Allowing a 5 percent increase in site coverage (area that buildings
can occupy on a site) to a maximum of 45 percent.

DH and I are planning to attend the meeting — it looks like a great way to learn more about our city and its processes, plus connect with other laneway lovers.

 

Support laneway houses in Vancouver!

We knew that the City of Vancouver was discussing laneway houses.

But now they are asking for our input.

Want to show some support?

 Council referred proposed amendments to the laneway housing regulations and guidelines, and expansion of the program to Public Hearing on June 11th, 2013

interested in what they have to say?  Here’s the proposed amendments. I have to admit I flagged about page 32, but then, my evenings are full of placing items in cardboard boxes prior to the big move.  I will read it, and I will be at that meeting if it is at all possible.

Gotta walk the walk, know what I mean?

Thanks to the guys at Lanefab for the heads-up.

My Pain, My Life, My Struggles, My Fight

Come walk with me, Down My Dark & Stormy Journey BUSINESS INQUIRIES & CONTACT EMAIL : GODSCHILD4048@GMAIL.COM

ANNOTATED AUDREY BLOG

Artist and Desert Dweller with Big City Style.

Im ashamed to die until i have won some victory for humanity.

Domenic Garisto / LIFE IS NOT A REHERSAL,SO LIVE IT..if you can't be the poet, be the poem..havau22.com

The Lady Who Lives Down the Lane

Lane Way Housing for the Nervous Novice

Apartment Therapy| Saving the world, one room at a time

Lane Way Housing for the Nervous Novice

Slightly Snug House

building a home that's not too big and not too small

Vancouverandy

Funny thoughts from a nut like me.

Small House Bliss

Small house designs with big impact

WeeHavyn

Lane Way Housing for the Nervous Novice